Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Blume v. Supilanas et al
as 2:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Blume
Defendant:
Mary Jean Supilanas, John W. Nau, Landon T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Allen et al v. New South Federal Savings Bank et al
as 2:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kwan Allen and Jelinda F. Gibson Allen
Defendant:
New South Federal Savings Bank, Seale, Smith, Zuber & Barnette and Mark C. Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK v. PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
as 2:2010cv07220
Plaintiff:
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461
USA v. AIG Federal Savings Bank et al
as 1:2010cv00178
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
AIG Federal Savings Bank and Wilmington Finance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Ginn Doose v. IRS, et al
as 09-56281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINN DOOSE, AKA Virginia Doose
Defendant - Appellee:
IRS, TIGTA Office of Investigation, HUD, Attn. General Counsel, ALBERTO GONZALES, the previous U.S. Attorney Genral and his predecessor of office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
