Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Winding v. Rice et al
as 4:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
Micheal Rice, G.E.O. Group, Inc. and E. L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Gill et al
as 4:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
Chasity Gill, B. Miza, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. D.O.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00938
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Sandoval
Defendant:
D.O.C., Lupe Martinez, G.E.O. Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00084
512) 495-9139 (fax:
Attorney General
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G.E.O. Group, Inc., I.N.S. and others
Petitioner:
Carlos Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morales-Cervantes v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00078
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, G.E.O. Group, Inc., Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Hector Morales-Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winding v. Sollie et al
as 4:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
William B. Sollie, E. J. Mitchell, Justin M. Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaacs v. Lappin et al
as 4:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Mark Isaacs
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Reeves County, G.E.O. Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivers v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Omer Rivers
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes, Kino Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2008cv00648
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EDWARD MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, G.E.O. GROUP, INC., LACKAWANA HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. G.E.O. Group, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00941
Plaintiff:
Colin Roach
Defendant:
G.E.O. Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
