Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Uzamere v. The State of New York
as 19-3825
Defendant / Appellee:
Kathleen Donelli, Honorable Carl J. Landicino, John and Jane Doe, Office Manager Social Security and others
Defendant:
Sharon Kelly Seyers, Eric A. Tepper, Hemalee J. Patel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cheryl D. Uzamere, individually and as the Sole Proprietor of Uzamere Word Processing and more
Kearns v. Cuomo
as 19-3769
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark J.F. Schroeder, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York and Andrew M. Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael P. Kearns, in his official capacity as Clerk of the County of Erie, New York and Michael P. Kearns, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Clerk of the County of Erie, New York
Defendant:
New York State Conservative Party
Malloy v. Cuomo
as 19-3759
Defendant / Appellee:
Tina M. Stanford, Chairwoman of the State of New York and Andrew Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Malloy
Uzamere v. The State of New York
as 19-3402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cheryl D. Uzamere, individually and as the Sole Proprietor of Uzamere Word Processing and more
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Kaufman, Esq., Matrimonial practice advisory and rules committee for the New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration, Honorable Sondra Miller, Honorary Chair, Matrimonial Practice Advisory and Rules Committee for the New York State Unified Court System, Honorable Jeffrey Sunshien, Matrimonial Practice Advisory and Rules Committee, Statewide Coordinating Judge for Matrimonial cases for the New York State Unifeid Court System and others
Schulz v. State of New York
as 19-2842
Defendant / Appellee:
John J. Flanagan, individually and in his former capacity as Majority Leader of the New York State Senate, Carl E. Heastie, individually and in his offical capacity as Speaker of the New York State Assembly, Thomas P. DiNapoli, in his offical capacity as Comptroller of New York State and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Futia, Jr. and Robert L. Schulz
Schulz v. State of New York
as 19-483
Defendant / Appellee:
John J. Flanagan, individually and in his former capacity as Majority Leader of the New York State Senate, Carl E. Heastie, individually and in his offical capacity as Speaker of the New York State Assembly, Thomas P. DiNapoli, in his offical capacity as Comptroller of New York State and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Futia, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert L. Schulz
Ramirez v. Rikers Island
as 19-383
Defendant / Appellee:
ACLU, American Civil Liberty, Darcel D. Clark, Bronx District Attorney, John Doe, Warden of Riker's Island Slave Complex and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells, Eugene Moore, Terrence D. Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Yunus v. Lewis-Robinson
as 19-382
Defendant / Appellant:
Derek Jones, Bureau Chief, in their individual capacity, Joan Lewis-Robinson, Parole Officer, in their individual capacity, Yolanda Vazquez, Parole Officer, in their individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, in their official capacities, NYS DOCCS Division of Parole and Rodney Young, Regional Director, and in their Individual and Official Capacities, Jointly and Severally
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Equan Yunus, Sr., AKA Damon Vincent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Browne v. Hyne
as 17-1304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kendall Browne
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles J. Hynes, Individually and as District Attorney of Kings County, Eric T. Schneiderman, as Attorney General of the State of New York, New York State Supreme Court and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
