Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Dendy et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2014cv08381
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dendy and Jason Polk
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howard Washington v. Client Network Services Incorp, et al
as 13-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD LEE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP and CLIENT NETWORK SERVICES INCORPORATED
Howard Washington v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 13-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD LEE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIENT NETWORK SERVICES INCORPORATED and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv22698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RICHES v. AMTRAK et al
as 2:2012cv01378
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
AMTRAK, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., GREYHOUND LINES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anne Sabetta, et al v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 12-15978
Plaintiff:
ANNE SABETTA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL WICHELMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., Doing Business as Amtrak, DBA Amtrak, CITY OF MARYSVILLE, COUNTY OF YUBA and others
Woodruff v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2011cv06970
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Woodruff
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
