Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Kifor v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1075
Plaintiff:
IMRE KIFOR
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, MIDDLESEX PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In Re: Fishman
as 24-1047
Petitioner:
DEBORAH FISHMAN
Respondent:
MASSACHUSETTS PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT, HONORABLE JUDGE CHRISTINE ANTHONY, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kifor v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv12692
Plaintiff:
Imre Kifor
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Governor Maura Healey, Attorney General Andrea Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caceres et al v. Middlesex Probate and Family Court
as 1:2023cv12248
Plaintiff:
Mirca Caceres and Guillermo Caceres
Defendant:
Middlesex Probate and Family Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Carr v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv11974
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
Rakhi Carr, Bristol County Probate and Family Court and Nancy Stanton Cross
Consolidated Defendant:
Department of Children and Families and Beth Amoroso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
