Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Howard v. Republican National Committee
as 23-3826
Plaintiff / Appellant: JACOB HOWARD, for himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, a Political Action Committee
Disability Rights Florida, et al v. Secretary, State of Florida, et al
as 23-13727
Plaintiff / Appellant: DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and others
Defendant / Appellee: SECRETARY, STATE OF FLORIDA, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR BAKER COUNTY and others
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff: DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant: ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, III, KEVIN LEWIS and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, VIRGINIA A. WASSERBERG and others
Petitioner: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff: MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant: NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOTO LATINO et al v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff: VOTO LATINO, THE WATAUGA COUNTY VOTING RIGHTS TASK FORCE, DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, STACY EGGERS IV and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, ALAN HIRSCH and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13245
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA, INC., LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Intervenor: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Liebert, Susan et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff: Susan Liebert, Anna Haas, Anna Poi and others
Defendant: Wisconsin Elections Commission, Don M. Millis, Robert F. Spindell and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Amicus Curiae: Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13085
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE NEW GEORGIA PROJECT, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, RISE, INC. and others
Intervenor: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, JOHNNY VARNER, JACK NOA and others
Michael Bost, et al v. Illinois State Board of Elections, et al
as 23-2644
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL J. BOST, LAURA POLLASTRINI and SUSAN SWEENEY
Defendant / Appellee: ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and BERNADETTE MATTHEWS, in her capacity as the Executive Director of the Illinois State Board of Elections
Amicus Curiae: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and RESTORING INTEGRITY AND TRUST IN ELECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?