Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Thompson v. Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency
as 3:2013cv00640
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Tennessee, et al v. Kathy Noble
as 13-5752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, WILLIAM HASLAM, SCOTT FOSTER, Hendersonville Mayor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHY NOBLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perry v. Hinds County Human Resource Agency et al
as 3:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Perry
Defendant:
Hinds County Human Resource Agency, Kenn Cockrell and Jane and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Durnin et al (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Benjamin S Burton
Defendant:
Joe Durnin, Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency, Andy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vincent Marquez v. Santa Cruz County Superior Cou, et al
as 09-17886
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT MARQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY
White v. Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency
as 1:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Shirley White
Defendant:
Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Marquez v. Santa Cruz County Superior Court et al
as 3:2009cv05397
Petitioner:
Vincent Marquez
Respondent:
Santa Cruz County Superior Court, The State of California and Santa Cruz County Human Resource Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
