Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Cartwright v. People of The State of Colorado et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff: Shondel Inez Cartwright
Defendant: People of The State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, Colorado State Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff: State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant: Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Thistle v. The State of Colorado We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv02076
Plaintiff: David John Thistle
Defendant: The State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv06057
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v. Wheeler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04869
Defendant: andrew r. wheeler and united states environmental protection agency
Plaintiff: state of north carolina, state of minnesota, state of maryland and others
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Arkansas, State of, National Hydropower Association and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Texas, State of West Virginia, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
People of the State of California v. Betsy Devos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv04717
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii, People of the State of California, New Jersey, State of and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Education and Betsy DeVos
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant: Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor: Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae: U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner: Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?