Cases 1 - 10 of 20
State of Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Miguel A. Cardona and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of West Virginia, et al v. SEC
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
Diarra v. U.S. Government et al
as 0:2021cv02033
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
U.S. Government, DeKalb County District Attorney, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv04160
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
United States, Joe Biden, Donald J Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
United States of America, et al v. Infinite Campus, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, Christopher Moritz, State of Illinois and others
Defendant:
Voxology, Inc., Shoutpoint, Inc., SP Licenses, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Madeline Pavek, et al v. Donald Trump for President, et al
as 20-2410
Not Yet Classified:
National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican National Committee and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Madeline Pavek, DSCC, Ethan Sykes and others
Defendant:
Steve Simon, In his official capacity as the Minnesota Secretary of State
Appellant:
Honest Elections Project, State of Texas, State of West Virginia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
