Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stephen D. Eide v. United States Justice Department
as 5:2021cv02005
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Eide
Defendant:
United States Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baity v. United States Postal Service et al
as 9:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Baity
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, The United States Justice Department and The United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Capers v. United States Justice Department
as 3:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Capers
Defendant:
United States Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Carlos Arroyo v. United States Justice Department et al
as 2:2014cv09497
Plaintiff:
Carlos Arroyo
Defendant:
ESPN Sports Studio, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jessica Johnson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00622
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Anthony Brodzki v. United States Justice Department
as 2:2011cv08569
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodzki
Defendant:
United States Justice Department
Veronica McCallup v. State of California et al
as 2:2010cv05548
Defendant:
City of Ontario California, City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Dept, Hertz Rent A Car and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCallup
Turney v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Michael Roy Turney
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tevis Ignacio v. United States Government, et al
as 08-17282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEVIS R. IGNACIO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, THE BANKING INDUSTRY and others
Head v. FBI et al
as 2:2008cv01028
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Head
Defendant:
FBI, CIA, United States Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
