Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
as 23-5283
In Re:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Patrick Doney, as representative for Patrick Doney, Richard F. Hamme, Gary Heinke and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Rick Cheeseman, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel and others
Sterling v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Victor Sterling
Defendant:
United States Navy, United States of America, Secretary of the Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Scarborough v. United States Navy et al
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Scarborough
Defendant:
United States Navy and United States Marine Corps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
