Cases 1 - 10 of 26,458
Banda-Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Betzabel Banda-Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America and Luis Curiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ensco International Inc. v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Ensco International Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Cole v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lynntorise Cole
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 U.S. as a Defendant (formerly Medical Malpractice)
Grant v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ahmad Grant
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Dorado v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Carlos Dorado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Recio-Rosas v. United States Of America
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Recio-Rosas
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McRunells v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Catrina McRunells
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Delacruz v. The United States Of America
as 4:2024cv01659
Petitioner:
Andrew Blake Delacruz
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Evans v. USA
as 24-40300
Plaintiff:
Christy G. Evans
Defendant:
United States of America, Lisa Greenway, Carrie Gilliam and others
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
