Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Banks
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Rox v. Thomas et al
as 2:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
Africa Y Rox
Defendant:
Travis L Thomas and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson vs. U.S. Department of Justice, et al.
as 1:2015cv00600
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
The United States, Department of Justice, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nettles v. Robertson et al
as 4:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Nettles
Defendant:
Kenneth Earl Robertson and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2014mc01553
Plaintiff:
Norma Jean King
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Whitner et al
as 2:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
William E Whitner, III and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv01032
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service Clayton, Alabama, United States Postal Inspector (Clayton) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012mc02307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harrelson v. United States of America et al (CONSENT)
as 3:2011cv00827
Plaintiff:
Dinah Kaye Harrelson
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
