Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Smith v. Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd.
as 0:2013cv01010
Plaintiff:
Theo Smith
Defendant:
Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd.
Kuzina v. Aramark Corp
as 3:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Theo Kuzina
Defendant:
Aramark Corp
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Middlesex Health Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Russo et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05359
Plaintiff:
Theo Ann Russo and Guy Russo
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv04599
Plaintiff:
Rachel Thomas and Robert Theo Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hardy v. Tanasoaia et al
as 3:2012cv01416
Plaintiff:
Olamae Hardy
Defendant:
Ionut Adrian Tanasoaia, AS Baschet Giurgiu, Federatia Romana De Baschet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FOREMAN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04160
Plaintiff:
CHUCK FOREMAN , ANTHONY RONALD YARY , JAMIE SUZANNE YARY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Petitioner:
JOHN GOODMAN and PHYLLIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOUGHTY v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57782
Plaintiff:
THEO E DOUGHTY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DOUGHTY v. AMERICAN HAWAIIAN S. S. LINES
as 2:2011cv57781
Plaintiff:
THEO E DOUGHTY
Defendant:
AMERICAN HAWAIIAN S. S. LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JORDAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62037
Plaintiff:
THEO A. JORDAN and CORA PEARL JORDAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , MINNESOTA MINING & MFG., CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. SMITH
as 2:2010cv05224
Plaintiff:
RENY SHERENE MORGAN
Defendant:
THEO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
