Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
POSADA et al v. BTB ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00687
Defendant: CHARLES THOMAS BROPHY and BTB ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Plaintiff: LUCY PINDER and LINA POSADA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Singh v. Barr
as 19-729
Undetermined: Thomas Brophy, Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States and others
Xu v. Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1044
Respondent / Appellee: THOMAS BROPHY, Assistant Field Office Director, KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant: LIQUN XU, a/k/a Dan Xu
Mathayo v. Nielsen et al
as 6:2018cv06664
Respondent: Kiratjen Nielsen, J. Searles, Thomas Feely and others
Petitioner: Deng Elharth Ziu Mathayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00804
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv30117
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00794
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aviles Rothchild v. Homan et al
as 1:2018cv11485
Defendant: Thomas Homan and Thomas Brophy
Plaintiff: Dean Himbler Aviles Rothchild
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10953
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?