Cases 1 - 10 of 36
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RYAN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
LYNN RYAN, WEST BAYOU OAKS TOWNHOMES CENTRAL ASSOCIATION, INC., TIMOTHY DARWIN TWINING and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DAWSON v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
MARK THOMAS DAWSON
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY, LAURA A. BODKIN, MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23546
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reuter et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2020cv02180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson Reuter and Dulce Victoria Galindo Felix
Defendant:
Michael R. Pompeo, Chad F Wolf, Eric S. Cohan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Donnie Dawson v. Connie Horton
as 20-1513
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden, Warden and CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONNIE THOMAS DAWSON
Dawson v. York Specialized Loss Adjusting Division of York Risk Services Group, Inc.
as 0:2020cv60065
Defendant:
York Specialized Loss Adjusting Division of York Risk Services Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. Winn
as 2:2019cv10388
Respondent:
Tom Winn and Thomas Winn
Petitioner:
Donnie Thomas Dawson
Thomas-Dawson v. Collins et al
as 2:2017cv13210
Plaintiff:
Donnie Anthony Thomas-Dawson
Defendant:
Tom Collins, Elizabeth Van Marcke, Trey Lyons and others
Craig Dawson, et al v. T. Givens, et al
as 16-35886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON and LOLA GLENN
Defendant - Appellee:
T. GIVENS, PHILLIPI, JEFF PREMO, Superintendent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
