Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fields v. The Dept. of New York City Corrections Rikers Island
as 1:2010cv04031
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Defendant:
The Dept. of New York City Corrections Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. The Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv03135
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections, K. Simpson, Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. The New York City Department of Corrections et al et al
as 1:2010cv03145
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Defendant:
The New York City Department of Corrections et al, Harris, Coddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Thomas Fields
as 09-3137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Thomas Fields
Fields v. The New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv08553
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Defendant:
The New York City Department of Corrections and Officer Oluroya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. The Department of Corrections Officer Gucciarez et al
as 1:2009cv07935
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections Officer Gucciarez and Caption Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. The Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv06895
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Oluroya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Salwillel Fields
as 09-40436
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SALWILLEL THOMAS FIELDS
Fields v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Salwillel Thomas Fields
Defendant:
Maxie Cerliano, Tim Bryon and Pam Hudgins
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
