Cases 1 - 6 of 6
USA v. Thomas Grossi, Sr., et al
as 13-15487
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
THOMAS GROSSI, Sr. and LAURETTA WEIMER
Claimant:
ALBERT B. DEL MASSO
Defendant:
2638 MARKET STREET, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA and $608,916.58 IN U.S. CURRENCY, as substitute RES for real property located at 2638 Market Street, Oakland, California
Grossi Development LLC, et al v. Town of Rehoboth, et al
as 11-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GROSSI DEVELOPMENT LLC and THOMAS GROSSI
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF REHOBOTH, TOWN OF REHOBOTH CONSERVATION COMMISSION, TOWN OF REHOBOTH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS and others
Defendant:
LAURIE BURT, Both in her official capacity and individually and TENA DAVIES, Both in her official capacity and individually
Grossi Development LLC, et al v. Town of Rehoboth, et al
as 11-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GROSSI DEVELOPMENT LLC and THOMAS GROSSI
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF REHOBOTH, TOWN OF REHOBOTH CONSERVATION COMMISSION, TOWN OF REHOBOTH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS and others
USA v. Thomas Grossi, Sr., et al
as 10-17821
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
THOMAS GROSSI, Sr.
Claimant:
LAURETTA WEIMER and ALBERT B. DEL MASSO
Defendant:
2638 MARKET STREET, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA and $608,916.58 IN U.S. CURRENCY, as substitute RES for real property located at 2638 Market Street, Oakland, California
Grossi Development LLC et al v. Town of Rehoboth et al
as 1:2010cv10728
Plaintiff:
Grossi Development LLC and Thomas Grossi
Defendant:
Town of Rehoboth, Town of Rehoboth Conservation Commission, Town of Rehoboth Zoning Board of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. $608,916.58 in U.S. Currency
as 4:2004cv03055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2638 Market Street, Oakland, California and $608,916.58 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Lauretta Weimer and Thomas Grossi
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
