Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Benjamin Ziogas v. Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk, et al
as 24-1646
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ZIOGAS
Defendant:
FOURTH DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT CLERK, CRAIG DEARMOND, THOMAS HARRIS and others
Ziogas v. Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk et al
as 3:2023cv03279
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Ziogas
Defendant:
Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk, Craig DeArmond, Thomas Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harry Bray
Defendant:
State of Oregon, D.O. M. Patton, Dr Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Chronister et al
as 8:2020cv00657
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc., Chad Chronister and Brian Christopher Bochert
Plaintiff:
Jessie Thomas Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Thomas Harris v. P. Eaton
as 2:2020cv02550
Respondent:
P. Eaton
Petitioner:
Kenneth Thomas Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Barr et al
as 4:2019cv01532
Defendant:
Federal Detention Center Philadelphia, Ralph Laughingwell, M.D., Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Thomas Harris v. Los Angeles County
as 2:2019cv07386
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas Harris
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Avanti Hospital Corp. MHG, Robert A. Bei M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Perry et al
as 7:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Rebecca Hamilton, David Duke, Daryl Bonnin and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Thomas Harris v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2019cv03204
Petitioner:
Kenneth Thomas Harris
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kirksey v. Burger King Worldwide Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06964
Plaintiff:
Aric A Kirksey
Defendant:
Burger King Worldwide Inc., Thomas Harris, Daniel Munoz-Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
