Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thomas Davis v. Brooks Goldsmith
as 23-7214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS P. GOLDSMITH, Judge of Circuits Courts/Retired, RACHEL DEANGELIS, Asst. Solicitor/State Prosecutor, CHRISTIAN D. ANDERSON, Beaufort County Sheriff Dept. and others
Davis v. Goldsmith et al
as 9:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Rev Thomas Louis Davis, Rev. Thomas L. Davis and Thomas L Davis
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Sherrif Officer Christian D. Anderson, Carmen T. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Davis v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2023cv02470
Petitioner:
Rev Thomas L Davis and Rev. Thomas Louis Davis
Respondent:
Christian D Anderson, State of South Carolina and Warden of Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Davis v. Christine Wilson
as 13-6668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS, Rev
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE WILSON, JAMES BUKOFFSKY, BRIAN CHAPMAN and others
Thomas Davis v. Angela Tanner
as 08-8103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA MCCALL TANNER, KIMBERLY SMITH, Ex Solicitor, MCDUFFEY STONE, III, Head Solicitor and others
Thomas Davis v. State of South Carolina
as 08-6181
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and PHILLIP FOOTE
Davis v. Erickson et al
as 9:2007cv03976
Plaintiff:
Thomas Louis Davis
Defendant:
Eric J Erickson, Christine L Wilson, Larry Weidner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Davis v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 9:2007cv03621
Petitioner:
Thomas Louis Davis
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Phillip Foote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
