Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Eric Brown, et al v. City of Wyoming, MI, et al
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC BROWN and ROY THORNE, individually and as next friend of S.T., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WYOMING, MI, KIMBERLY KOSTER, Chief, LOGAN WIEBER, Officer and others
Thorn v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv12592
Plaintiff:
Cody Thorn
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and Nisha Chellam, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown, Roy Thorne and S.T. a Minor through his Next Friend Roy Thorne
Defendant:
City of Wyoming, Chief Kimberly Koster, Officer Logan Wieber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2021cv02110
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Dr. Joris M. Ray
Plaintiff:
Barton Thorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. City of Canton et al
as 5:2018cv01455
Defendant:
James Dreussi, Vincent Romanin, Timothy Thorn and others
Plaintiff:
Stephan Richburg II and Stephen Richburg, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. County of Macomb et al
as 2:2018cv11248
Plaintiff:
Dequan Flowers
Defendant:
County of Macomb , Brandon Medlow , James Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Guadalupe Garcia v. Matthew Thorne
as 12-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUADALUPE LINDA GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW THORNE
Peters v. Shelby County, TN et al
as 2:2012cv02154
Plaintiff:
Thorne Michael Peters
Defendant:
Shelby County, TN, William L Gibbons and Mark H. Luttrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
