Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis et al v. Thorntons Inc. - Tennessee
as 3:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Darryl Davis and Lizette Davis
Defendant:
Thorntons Inc. - Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hereford v. Thorntons, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00859
Plaintiff:
Denise Hereford
Defendant:
Thorntons, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Harden v. Hillman et al
as 3:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
John K. Harden
Defendant:
Keith Hillman, The City of Heritage Creek and Thorntons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorntons, Inc. v. Lagavulin Investment Company
as 2:2015cv02368
Defendant:
Lagavulin Investment Company
Plaintiff:
Thorntons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schneider Electric, Inc. et al v. Courtney et al
as 5:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Schneider Electric, Inc. , Schneider Canada, Inc. , Schneider Electric USA, Inc., and others
Defendant:
John T. Courtney, Leak Eliminators, LLC, William Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meinhart v. Campbell et al
as 3:2007cv00465
Plaintiff:
Chris Meinhart, Chris Meinhart and Chris Meinhart
Defendant:
Michael L. Campbell, Matthew J. Metzler, Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorntons, Inc. v. Chicago title Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Thorntons, Inc., Thorntons, Inc. and Thorntons, Inc.
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company and Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Keen Exploration, LLC et al v. Amoco Oil Company et al
as 5:2007cv00014
Plaintiff:
Keen Exploration, LLC, Sue Harris and Lisa McBride
Defendant:
Amoco Oil Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Citgo Petroleum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
