Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Arellano v. Tice et al
as 4:2023cv02798
Plaintiff:
Jose Arellano
Defendant:
Andrew Scott Tice and Hall Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hernandez-Cabello v. Tice et al
as 4:2023cv02001
Plaintiff:
Sofia Hernandez-Cabello and Lilly Mendoza Hernandez
Defendant:
Jim Tice and MCLO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tice v. Hospira, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Paula Tice
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC f/k/a Hospira Worldwide, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tice-Harouff v. Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cami Jo Tice-Harouff
Defendant:
Carole Johnson, Health Resources and Services Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Everett Arnold, et al v. Barbers Hill Independent Sch, et al
as 20-20488
Defendant / Appellant:
Mandy Malone, Clint Pipes, Doug Anderson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cindy Bradford
Tice v. Holland Acquisitions, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02389
Defendant:
Holland Acquisitions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Tice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Nelson v. City of Bay St. Louis et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
City of Bay St. Louis, Pat Tice, Gary Ponthieux and others
Plaintiff:
John Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nordstrom v. Nuttall et al
as 6:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Kyle Nuttall, Deputy James Sherer and Trooper FNU Tice
Plaintiff:
Paul Nordstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cespedes v. Tice et al
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
Billy Gerald Tice, Jr and GEICO Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Cespedes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
