Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI-SOMERSET FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, C/O MACHESKY, MR. CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tice v. PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk et al
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Tice
Defendant:
PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk and William Cory Stocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKOX v. TICE et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Defendant:
ZACHARY MOSLAK, MELANIE PYLE, ERIC TICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HICKOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00119
Defendant:
CO HOFFMAN, JOHN WETZEL, JAMES BARNACLE and others
Plaintiff:
QUIR R. RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PIRL v. RINGLING et al
as 2:2019cv01661
Defendant:
MR. RINGLING and ERIC TICE
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS PIRL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Abdul Ideen v. Straub, et al
as 15-1070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL IDEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
AGENT STRAUB, ET AL, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, DORINA VARNER and others
K.W. et al v. Holtzapple et al
as 4:2013cv03051
Plaintiff:
K.W. , F.E. , B.J. and others
Defendant:
Julie A. Holtzapple , James R. Middleton , Michael C. Griffiths and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
