Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., ABBIE TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN HORN
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Morgan v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2024cv02026
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Morgan
Defendant:
American Airlines and dDR. HARRY HAZELWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Proctor v. Howard et al
as 1:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Proctor
Defendant:
Dr. Jacqueline Howard, PA Taylor Talasky, CRNP Tiffany Sottile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neafcy v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01225
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Neafcy
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HORSCH v. CANTYMAGLI et al
as 2:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAY HORSCH
Defendant:
JOSEPH CANTYMAGLI and TIFFANY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
LLOYD FRANCIS
Defendant:
AMBER TIFFANY SMITH, DELTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT, JOELLE SHANESY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
