Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Tillman v. The Center for the Homeless et al
as 3:2021cv00637
Plaintiff:
Joseph Paul Tillman
Defendant:
The Center for the Homeless, Kim Barrier and Myrnetta Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Jeffery Nottestad, by its Special Administrator Arianne Clark v. La Crosse County
as 3:2021cv00535
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jeffery Nottestad, by its Special Administrator Arianne Clark
Defendant:
La Crosse County, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Amber Fennigkoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TILLMAN v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00038
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Respondent:
B. LAMMER, J. BRADLEY and FCC TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TILLMAN v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Respondent:
B. LAMMER, J. BRADLEY and FCC TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TILLMAN v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00037
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Respondent:
B. LAMMER, J. BRADLEY and FCC TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TILLMAN v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00035
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Respondent:
B. LAMMER, J. BRADLEY and FCC TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TILLMAN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Respondent:
B. LAMMER, J. SIMS, FCC TERRE HAUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TILLMAN v. SIMS et al
as 2:2021cv00001
Defendant:
C. MCGUIRE, STOREBREAKER, J. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TILLMAN v. BRYANT et al
as 2:2020cv00592
Defendant:
S. BRYANT, D. RAMEY, K. SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
