Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mace v. Prumell et al
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Mace
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Prumell, Jennifer Jordan, Poulton Tamantha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20634
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH BRIDGEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nesdahl v. USA
as 4:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BURNS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09312
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH BURNS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Rose
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timothy McIlwain v. Allen Dodd, III, et al
as 22-5219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH MCILWAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEN P. DODD, III, Esquire, an Individual, ELIZABETH DODD, Esquire, an individual and ALLEN M. DODD, Esquire, an Individual
Timothy Carroll v. Chris Luebe, et al
as 22-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Joseph Carroll
Defendant / Appellee:
Chris Luebe, Leon Chapmen, Hunter Lewis and others
SHULTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH SHULTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timothy Carroll v. Rosetta McAllister, et al
as 21-3706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Joseph Carroll
Defendant / Appellee:
Rosetta McAllister, RN and Jesse N., Patient
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
