Cases 11 - 20 of 30
LITTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94405
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LITTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv17544
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Williams v. Timothy Little, et al
as 19-2393
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER GINTER and COUNSEELOR BEARDSLEY
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER LOY, UNIT MANAGER DEFILICE, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
MAYO v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, OFFICER HAVENS, OFFICER BARBOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, BARRY SMITH, LT. KOVAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
ALEX BELL
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, CAPTAIN ACEY, ANGEL STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DIPIETRO v. WETZEL, et al
as 3:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, DANIEL MIENERT, RANDLE PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE et al
as 2:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
HEATH EVANS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MONROEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiPietro v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2016cv02423
Plaintiff:
Nicodemo DiPietro
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Daniel Mienert, Randle Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, CHENCHARICK, SAWTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
