Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Michael Webb v. Anthony Fauci We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2394
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID WEBB, d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8), d/b/a Major Mike Webb for VA, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for APS Board
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY S. FAUCI, in official and individual capacities, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, ROCHELLE WALENSKY, in official and individual capacities and others
Major Mike Webb v. Fauci et al
as 3:2021cv00432
Petitioner: Major Mike Webb d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb, Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8), Major Mike Webb for VA and Major Mike Webb for APS Board and Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb doing business as Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8) doing business as Major Mike Webb for VA doing business as Major Mike Webb for APS Board
Respondent: Anthony S. Fauci, National Institute for Allergy & Infectious Disease (NIAID), Rochelle Walensky and others
Defendant: BIONTECH SE, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Jennifer R. Psaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larry Patterson v. Timothy Kaine We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-7703
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY E. PATTERSON and JAMES R. CLARK
Plaintiff: ELMO A. REID, JR.
Defendant: TIMOTHY M. KAINE, Governor of the State of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity, JOHN W. MARSHALL, Secretary of Public Safety of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity and HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board, sued in her official and individual capacity
Movant: DEREK T. FRITZINGER and MELVIN C. DODSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-7229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00686
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Virginia State Conference of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Branches et al v. Kaine et al
as 2:2008cv00508
Plaintiff: Virginia State Conference of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Branches, Virginia State Conference of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Branches, King Salim Khalfani and others
Defendant: Timothy M. Kaine, Jean Cunningham, Harold Pyon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Virginia State Conference of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Branches et al v. Kaine et al
as 3:2008cv00692
Plaintiff: Virginia State Conference of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Branches, Virginia State Conference of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Branches, King Salim Khalfani and others
Defendant: Timothy M. Kaine, Jean Cunningham, Harold Pyon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Ron-Messer v. Kaine et al
as 3:2008cv00488
Plaintiff: Ada L. Ron-Messer
Defendant: Timothy M. Kaine, Mark R. Warner, Judith W. Jagdmann and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Herdt v. Young et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00532
Petitioner: Michael J. Herdt
Respondent: Stanley K. Young, The State of Virginia, Timothy M. Kaine and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Patterson et al v. Kaine et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00490
Plaintiff: Larry E. Patterson, Elmo A. Reid, Jr. and James R. Clark
Defendant: Timothy M. Kaine, John W. Marshall and Helen F. Fahey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?