Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Phifer v. Maricopa County Defense Team et al
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Maricopa County Defense Team, Scott Boncoskey, Todd Paul Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Boncoskey et al
as 2:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Scott Boncoskey, Todd P Romero, Office of Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Phifer v. Boncoskey et al
as 2:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Scott Boncoskey, Todd P Romero, Maricopa Defense Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Witz et al
as 4:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Joseph Witz, DW Martinez, ADW Straubs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Valdez et al
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Unknown Valdez, Unknown Patterson, Unknown Marsk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Boncoskey et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Scott Boncoskey, Todd Romero and Seth Turken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Sevelis v. USA
as 21-71152
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY SCOTT SEVELIS, AKA Timothy Sevelis
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sevelis v. USA
as 4:2021cv00253
Petitioner:
Timothy Scott Sevelis and Timothy Sevelis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sevelis v. Kline et al
as 2:2021cv01005
Defendant:
K Kline and Unknown Childs
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Sevelis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
