Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Steele v. Bhardwaj et al
as 1:2024cv10309
Plaintiff:
Timothy Steele
Defendant:
Shiva Bhardwaj, Pitstop Connect Inc. and Pitstop Connect Inc. doing business as Pitstop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Anete Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05035
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00821
Plaintiff:
Rosario, Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Steele v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02546
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Timothy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Steel v. Dan Winkleski
as 21-2064
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY STEEL
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN WINKLESKI, Warden
Pondel v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 1:2019cv01078
Plaintiff:
Timothy Steele Pondel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steele v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Timothy Steele
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC and McLemore & Edington, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Little et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
Donna Little , Randy Bayne , Joseph Bourlet and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Bedrock Gypsum, BNBM and others
Movant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
