Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Whitfield v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Timothy Whitfield
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Allen v. Bulk Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dequan Allen
Defendant:
Timothy Whitfield and Bulk Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Whitfield v. USA
as 20-2002
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Applicant:
TIMOTHY WHITFIELD
Whitfield v. Campbell County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Newport Police Department, McCarthy, Asst. District Attorney in Charge and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04469
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Whitfield v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-1333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WHITFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, Criminal Division and others
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Timothy Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, Cook County Circuit Court Criminal Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
JOHN RELVAS , ESTATE OF RUI RELVAS , ESTATE OF JOAO RELVAS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Whitfield v. Birkett et al
as 1:2010cv05700
Plaintiff:
Timothy Whitfield
Defendant:
Joe Birkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Of America v. Whitfield
as 1:2009cv01757
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
Timothy Whitfield
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
