Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tinsley v. Trident Asset Management LLC
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Cara Tinsley
Defendant:
Trident Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fowler et al v. TSTL Holdings LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Fowler and Leanne Word
Defendant:
TSTL Holdings LLC, Gordon Tinsley and Stacey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oliver v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00653
Petitioner:
Corderell Oliver and Demone Tinsley
Respondent:
Joseph H Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underwood v. Richie et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and P Richie
Petitioner:
David Tinsley Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Tinsley (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00664
Plaintiff:
Sadaka Davis
Defendant:
Velma Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley et al v. BP Corporation North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Tinsley and Real Men Building for Future Generations
Defendant:
BP Corporation North America, Inc. , BP America, Inc. , Craig Cerise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinsley v. Estes et al
as 2:2013cv01590
Petitioner:
Mark Luke Tinsley
Respondent:
Dewayne Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tinsley v. USA
as 1:2011cv00726
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jerry Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Underwood et al v. Cullman County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2011cv02588
Plaintiff:
David Tinsley Underwood and Becky Jordan
Defendant:
Cullman County Sheriff's Department , Tyler Roden , Vincent Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
