Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv10888
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv10755
Plaintiff:
Toby Smith
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Allstar Fire Equipment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
Devonte King
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, City of North Platte NE and Toby Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kayla Reed
Defendant:
Toby Smith, Sarah Jones, Kent Turnbull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Andrew J. Van Velson, Toby Smith and Kendell Allison
Plaintiff:
Devonte M.D. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A Man v. Jay et al
as 8:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
A Man and Devonte King
Defendant:
Toby Smith, Joel Jay, Kent E. Florom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv03079
Defendant:
Sarah Jones, Angela M. Franz and Toby Smith
Plaintiff:
I: a woman and Kayla Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Pete Ricketts, Sarah Jones, Susanne Shore and others
Plaintiff:
Devonte MD King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Jones et al
as 4:2021cv03051
Defendant:
Sarah Jones, James Hagen, Toby Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla P. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62352
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
