Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dymond v. Tokar
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Lucas J. Dymond
Defendant:
Justin Tokar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WYNKOOP v. AVONWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
HARRY WYNKOOP
Defendant:
AVONWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. JEFF HADLEY, YU-LING CHENG-BEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Animal Welfare League v. Village Of Chicago Ridge et al
as 1:2020cv03919
Plaintiff:
Animal Welfare League
Defendant:
Edmund Kowalski, Charles E. Tokar and Village Of Chicago Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Francis Lombardo v. Frank Coslett, et al
as 15-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY JOSEPH LOMBARDO
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK COSLETT, TOKAR, PA State Parole Officer and OFFICER HUSSEIN, PA State Parole Officer
Hoffmeister v. Village Of Chicago Ridge et al
as 1:2014cv05827
Plaintiff:
Mark Hoffmeister
Defendant:
Village Of Chicago Ridge , Charles Tokar and Bob Muszynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marc Keating v. Pittston City, et al
as 14-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC KEATING
Defendant - Appellee:
PITTSTON CITY, TOKAR, HUSSEIN and others
Francis Lombardo v. Justin Tokar, et al
as 14-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY JOSEPH LOMBARDO
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN TOKAR, SGT. WILLIAM CURRY, ALL OF PITTSTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Studli v. Children and Youth Services et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sherry Studli
Defendant:
Children and Youth Services, Children and Youth and Families Central Regional Office, Judge John Cascio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lombardo v. Tokar et al
as 3:2011cv02147
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Joseph Lombardo
Defendant:
Justin Tokar, Dion Fernandez, William Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
