Cases 31 - 40 of 3,620
Daheya v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
Saber Daheya
Defendant:
Tom Dart, J. Danner-Lardino, C. Deanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, C.O. Guzman and Sgt. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santoyo v. Cook County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ruben Santoyo
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
R Ramirez, X Saldana, R Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Williamson, Rajon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Dart
as 1:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Shameka Mosby
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fox Head, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Fox Head, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Yanjing ww, Guangzhou Anson Speedy Riding Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
