Cases 11 - 20 of 29
FABICS et al v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS et al
as 3:2014cv02202
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FABICS, PAUL DEAN, MOSES WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS, TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS, SOUTH BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FABICS et al v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS et al
as 3:2013cv06025
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FABICS, PAUL DEAN, MOSES WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS, TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS, CITY OF GARFIELD AND ITS AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stornello v. Sampson et al
as 1:2013cv13085
Plaintiff:
Angelo Stornello
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Stephen DeBoer and Tom Combs
Marc Jakaj v. Tom Combes, et al
as 13-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC RICHARD JAKAJ
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM COMBES, Michigan Parole Board: Chairman, AMY BONITO, BARBERA SAMPSON and others
O'Neil v. Kloska et al
as 2:2013cv10081
Petitioner:
Thomas Lee O'Neil
Respondent:
Todd Kloska and Tom Combs
Jakaj #189658 v. Combes et al
as 2:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Marc R. Jakaj #189658
Defendant:
Tom Combes, Amy Bonito, Barbera Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 4:2012cv15106
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Amy Bonito and others
Denver Goree, Jr. v. Tom Combs, et al
as 12-2463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENVER MAXWELL GOREE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM COMBS, Chairperson, Michigan Parole Board and AMY M. BONITO
Thorp #495722 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2012cv01060
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon Thorp #495722
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Amy Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Jones, Jr. v. Anthony King, et al
as 12-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY KING, AMY M. BONITO and TOM COMBS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
