Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Adams v. New York City Police Department
as 1:2015cv05319
Plaintiff:
Tommy Adams
Defendant:
New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. Berg
as 1:2015cv03968
Plaintiff:
Tommy Adams
Defendant:
Rav Berg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Pope Francis et al
as 1:2015cv03647
Plaintiff:
Tommy Adams
Defendant:
Timothy Dolan, Pope Francis, Roman Catholic Archbishop of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. Rubinstein et al
as 1:2015cv03532
Plaintiff:
Tommy Adams
Defendant:
Ellis Rubinstein and The New York Academy of Sciences
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattox v. Owens et al
as 6:2013cv00538
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Mattox
Defendant:
Jerome Owens, Tommy Adams, Misty Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. Owens et al
as 1:2013cv00487
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Mattox
Defendant:
Jerome Owens, Tommy Adams, Misty Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Tommy Adam
as 12-2125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOMMY ADAMS
McBride et al v. City Of Jasper et al
as 1:2011cv00443
Plaintiff:
Robert McBride , Willie Rawls , Linda Jones and others
Defendant:
City Of Jasper , Mike Lout , Karen Pumphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Adams et al v. Anoka-Hennepin EM Narcotics & Violent Crimes Task Force et al
as 0:2008cv05829
Plaintiff:
Tommy Adams and Kathleen Adams
Defendant:
Anoka-Hennepin EM Narcotics & Violent Crimes Task Force, Anoka-Hennepin EM Narcotics & Violent Crimes Task Force, John Doe Officers 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Richardson et al
as 1:2007cv00952
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Rhodes
Defendant:
Jeff Richardson, Tommy Adams and Newton City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
