Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Maldonado v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Maldonado
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Aimee Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. IRS
as 1:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Tony Taylor
Defendant:
IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Ross et al
as 5:2021cv00600
Defendant:
Officer Ross, Owner Ken Babby and Akron Police Department
Plaintiff:
Tony Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CCB et al v. Rosenthal et al
as 1:2020cv06794
Defendant:
Heartshare Human Services of New York, City of New York, Carmen Smith and others
Plaintiff:
CCB and RB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers et al v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Joel Williams, Hinds County, Mississippi, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Summers, Jakiyah Summers, Aaliyah Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
SMITH v. TAYLOR
as 3:2015cv00506
Plaintiff:
CORY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
TONY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tony Taylor, Jr. v. Value Place Motel, et al
as 15-3881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY TAYLOR, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
VALUE PLACE MOTEL, OFFICER NO. 1, Individually, and in his official capacity as City of Green Police Officer, OFFICER NO. 2, Individually, and in his official capacity as City of Green Police Officer and others
FAIRCLOTH et al v. CITY OF CRESTVIEW, FL et al
as 3:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FAIRCLOTH and MATTHEW PURVINES
Defendant:
CITY OF CRESTVIEW, FL, TONY TAYLOR and JOEY FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
