Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04672
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Chiu et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11893
Plaintiff: Sajid Wraich, Estate of Kum S. Lee, Craig Watkins and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
TOOLASPRASHAD v. SHULKIN et al
as 1:2018cv00631
Plaintiff: L. TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant: DAVID J. SHULKIN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, PERRY HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toolasprashad v. Holder, et al
as 1:2013cv00882
Plaintiff: Latchmie Toolasprashad
Defendant: Eric H. Holder, Jr., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and Walter M. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOOLASPRASHAD v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01197
Plaintiff: LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and WALTER M. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00713
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Toolasprashad v. Holder
as 13-2668
Petitioner: Latchmie Narayan Toolasprashad
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
In Re: Latchmie Toolasprashad
as 13-230
Movant: In re: LATCHMIE NARAYAN TOOLASPRASHAD
:
Toolasprashad v. Tryon et al
as 1:2013cv00080
Plaintiff: Latchmie Toolasprashad
Defendant: Todd Tryon, Michael Phillips, Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toolasprashad v. Holder
as 13-85
Petitioner: Latchmie Narayan Toolasprashad
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?