Cases 1 - 10 of 16,873
Conde v. AZ Torres LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Leticia Conde
Defendant:
AZ Torres LLC, Adolfo Torres and Zindy Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Torres v. Core Contracting, Inc, et al
as 3:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Juan Torres
Defendant:
Core Contracting, Inc, and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
Ramirez v. Tommasi et al
as 3:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Theresa Tommasi, Val and Travis Michael Kelce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Guerra-Torres v. Garland
as 24-3207
Petitioner:
VILMA YOLANDA GUERRA-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Duneske v. Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11318
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Roseville Police Department, Mitch Berlin, Robert Gudenau and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Marin v. Catano, et al.
as 24-3175
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
KRISTINE CATANO, in their official and personal capacity, ADELA DE LA TORRE, in their official and personal capacity, VANESSA RUIZ, in their official and personal capacity and others
Torres, et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
as 24-3164
Petitioner:
DOROTHY TORRES, LUIS TORRES and Dotty Torres
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Interested Party:
JAYCO, INC.
USA v. Torres-Perdomo
as 24-40351
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Zenen Torres-Perdomo
Nevarez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Robert Nevarez, Sr.
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Tempe, City of, Peter Klepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
