Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Williams v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Donald Williams
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, The, Derek Chauvin and Tou Thao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States v. Tou Thao
as 22-2910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Tou Thao
Schaffer v. Chauvin et al
as 0:2020cv01577
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of, the, Derek Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng and others
Plaintiff:
Kaarin Nelson Schaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00258
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Tou Lee
White v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05144
Defendant:
Sgt. John M. Sheppard, Benton County Arkansas, Unknown Employees of the Benton County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gene White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Thunder et al
as 0:2017cv01110
Plaintiff:
Lamar Ferguson
Defendant:
Robert Thunder, Tou Thao and City of Minneapolis, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Tou Fang
as 16-1322
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Tou Chi Fang
Kevin Murphy, et al v. Aurora Loan Services, et al
as 13-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin M. Murphy and Kathleen K. Murphy
Plaintiff:
James L. Lang, Charlene Ann Brady, Erika R. Hogenson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Aurora Bank FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
James Lang, et al v. Aurora Loan Services, et al
as 13-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin M. Murphy, Kathleen K. Murphy, James L. Lang and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Aurora Bank FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv05085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
