Cases 1 - 10 of 14
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11968
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10027
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Town of Ayer v. Chemicals Incorporated
as 2:2021cv03214
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Defendant:
Chemicals Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Town of Ayer v. Dynax Corporation
as 2:2021cv01788
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Town of Ayer v. Chemicals Incorporated
as TXS/3:21-CV-00107
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Defendant:
Chemicals Incorporated
Town of Ayer v. Dynax Corporation
as 7:2021cv04373
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Town of Ayer v. Chemicals Incorporated
as 3:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Chemicals Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Town of Ayer v. Dynax Corporation
as NYS/7:21-CV-04373
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation
Town of Ayer v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2019cv03120
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, John Doe Defendants 1-49, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Ayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
