Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tremane Darnell Carthen v. USA
as 22-12963
Petitioner / Appellant:
TREMANE D. CARTHEN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carthen v. LaFave et al
as 7:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
Lt. LaFave, Lt. Bellamy, Lt. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carthen v. LaFave et al
as 7:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
Lt. LaFave, Lt. Bowles, Lt. Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
In re: Tremane Carthen
as 21-14287
Petitioner:
In re: TREMANE D. CARTHEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Tremane Carthen
as 16-17653
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TREMANE D. CARTHEN and SCOTTIE JEROMA GROCE
Tremane Carthen v. D. Marshall, et al
as 16-12822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREMANE D. CARTHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. T. MARSHALL, Sheriff, BATES, HUGHLEY, LPN and others
Carthen v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, Montgomery County Detention Facility, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carthen v. Baptist South Medical Center et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
Baptist South Medical Center, Executive Hospital Administrator and Jerry Gurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carthen v. Baptist South Medical Center et al
as 7:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Tremane D Carthen
Defendant:
Baptist South Medical Center, Jerry Gurley and Executive Hospital Administrator
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carthen v Montgomery County Detention Facility et al
as 7:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
Tremane D Carthen
Defendant:
Montgomery County Detention Facility, D. T. Marshall, Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
