Cases 1 - 10 of 23
TROTTER v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY TROTTER
Defendant:
BRANDON LOGAN and CITY OF LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TROTTER v. CSX TRANSPORATION, INC.
as 1:2022cv01915
Plaintiff:
CAMERON TROTTER
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Trotter v. Ulrich et al
as 1:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roderick O Trotter
Defendant:
S Ulrich, G Dambra, G Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00150
Petitioner:
Terrence Trotter
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WYATT v. TROTTER, et al.
as 2:2016cv00425
Defendant:
JUDY ANDERSON, CITY OF TERRE HAUTE, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WYATT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYATT v. TROTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00146
Defendant:
CITY OF TERRE HAUTE, COUNTY OF VIGO, TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WYATT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROTTER v. MENARD, INC.
as 2:2014cv00403
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY E. TROTTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trotter et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
William P Trotter , Jr and Faye D Trotter
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet U S Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALLARD et al v. TROTTER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
as 1:2013cv01752
Plaintiff:
JOHN BALLARD and MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
TROTTER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
