Cases 1 - 10 of 205
FEG Holdings, LLC v. Truist Bank, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
FEG Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin v. Deco 969 et al
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin and Lakeshia Edmond
Defendant:
Deco 969, Truist Bank, Haltom Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sharpton et al v. Truist Bank
as 6:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
William Sharpton and Wayne Sharpton
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System v. PlayAGS, Inc., et al.
as 24-1701
Plaintiff:
OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff
Defendant:
PLAYAGS, INC., DAVID LOPEZ, KIMO AKIONA and others
New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant:
AGILON HEALTH, INC., Steven J Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
