Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sullivan v. Lake County Sheriff's Department, Painesville, Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Sullivan
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff's Department, Painesville, Ohio, Sheriff Frank Leonbruno, C.O. Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuttle v. Streeval et al
as 0:2021cv00053
Defendant:
SHU CT, Jason C. Streeval and Captain
Plaintiff:
Ronald Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle v. USA
as 3:2021cv00064
Petitioner:
Marty K Tuttle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tuttle v. United States
as 0:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
United States and Ronald Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Bennett et al
as 2:2018cv00592
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Collins
Defendant:
Drake E. Bennett , William M. Hughes and Jeremy R. Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Gary C Mohr, Gary R. Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Madison Correctional Institution, Deputy Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Tuttle, II v. Carroll County Detention Cente, et al
as 10-5693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES GILBERT TUTTLE, II
Defendant - Appellee:
CARROLL COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MIKE HUMPHREY, Jailer and HENSLEY, Deputy
Tuttle v. Carroll County Detention Center et al
as 3:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Gilbert Tuttle, II
Defendant:
Carroll County Detention Center, Mike Humphrey and Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
