Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vasbinder v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2024cv40017
Plaintiff:
William J. Vasbinder
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Christopher Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hillman et al
as 1:2021cv11704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Judge Timothy S. Hillman, Judge Sidney Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30064
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Tuttle
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Lu v. Stanton et al
as 1:2020cv10366
Defendant:
Julie Goldman, Massachusetts Court System, Paul Tuttle and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boisvert v. Healy et al
as 4:2019cv40132
Defendant:
Amy D., Andrew Abdella, Maura Healy and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Boisvert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grannum v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2018cv40137
Defendant:
Lewis G. Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Lit. M Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eric Grannum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle v. Martinez
as 3:2018cv30128
Defendant:
Alex Martinez
Plaintiff:
David Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fulton, Jr v. Worcester Superior Court Department et al
as 4:2018cv40048
Defendant:
Worcester Superior Court Department, Worcester County Sheriff's Office, Janet Kenton-Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Fulton, Jr, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton, Jr v. Worcester County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2018cv40022
Plaintiff:
Albert Fulton, Jr, III
Defendant:
Worcester County Sheriff Office, Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2018cv40014
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Steven Fontaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
