Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Becerra v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv02065
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America, FMC Rochester Prison Officials, Staff, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Milyard et al
as 1:2012cv02686
Plaintiff:
Eric Marshall
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard, Michael Negley, Tweeten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Milyard et al
as 1:2009cv02687
Plaintiff:
Eric Marshall
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard, Michael Negley, Tweeten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. Tweeten
as 5:2009cv00054
Defendant:
Rolf Tweeten
Plaintiff:
Keith Hansen
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Axis Hospitality, Inc. et al v. Hansen
as 1:2008cv07212
Plaintiff:
Axis Hospitality, Inc. and Rolf Tweeten
Defendant:
Keith Hansen
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harbury, Jennifer K. v. Hayden, Michael V., et al
as 06-5282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jennifer K. Harbury, on her own behalf and as administratrix of the Estate of Efrain Bamaca-Valasquez
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael V. Hayden, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), John M. Deutch, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), R. James Woolsey, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Barney Frank
Harbury, Jennifer K. v. Deutch, John M., et al
as 99-5307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jennifer K. Harbury, on her own behalf and as administratrix of the Estate of Efrain Bamaca-Velasquez
Defendant - Appellee:
John M. Deutch, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), R. James Woolsey, Director, CIA, Robert M. Gates, Director, CIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
