Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tirrell Middleton v. Tyler Womack, et al
as 26-2612
Plaintiff:
Tirrell Audrelius Middleton
Defendant:
Tyler Womack, Brandon M. Norfolk, Kyle W. Kondoudis and others
Middleton v. Womack et al
as 1:2026cv00123
Plaintiff:
Tirrell Audrelius Middleton
Defendant:
Tyler Womack, Brandon M. Norfolk, Kyle W. Kondoudis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Trout et al
as 1:2025cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Hicks
Defendant:
F.U.M. Richard Trout, Sgt. Tyler Womack, Sgt. Brandon Western and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Womack et al
as 4:2025cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dickerson
Defendant:
Tyler Womack and City of Decherd, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beal v. Womack et al
as 1:2025cv00069
Plaintiff:
Camaron Beal
Defendant:
Tyler Womack, Jesse May, Unknown Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Monderen, Sr. v. William Stange, et al
as 25-1420
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Warden, Latonia Young-Griffin, Asst. Warden, Timothy Seabaugh, Deputy Warden and others
Monderen et al v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Defendant:
Joshua Hayden, Unknown Danner, Kam'ron English and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Trout et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dillonger John Majors
Defendant:
Richard Trout, Sophie Machen, Unknown Reavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel Rios Rosa v. Tyler Womack
as 23-3722
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Tyler Womack, Sergeant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
